Trump Issues Ultimatum to Zelenskyy on Peace Plan for Ukraine

U.S. President Donald Trump has stated that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy must approve a new peace plan aimed at halting Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine. During a press conference on March 15, 2024, following a meeting with New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani, Trump emphasized the necessity of Zelenskyy’s support for the plan, which is backed by Washington.

Trump expressed disappointment that the conflict had not been resolved more swiftly, citing his previously established rapport with Russian President Vladimir Putin. He noted, “It does take two to tango,” highlighting the complexities involved in negotiating peace. Trump described the situation in Ukraine as “horrible” and stated, “We have a way of getting peace, or we think we have a way of getting to peace. He’s going to have to approve it,” referring to Zelenskyy.

The proposed peace plan reportedly consists of 28 points that require Ukraine to make significant concessions. Key elements include ceding territory to Russia, accepting restrictions on its military capabilities, and renouncing aspirations to join NATO. This plan, if accepted, would mark a substantial shift in Ukraine’s foreign policy and military posture.

Reaction to Trump’s statements has been mixed, with some critics arguing that the demands placed upon Ukraine would undermine its sovereignty. Supporters of the plan, however, contend that any resolution is imperative to end the conflict and restore stability to the region.

As the situation evolves, both Zelenskyy and Trump are expected to engage in further discussions regarding the terms of the proposed peace deal. The outcome of these negotiations will undoubtedly have significant implications for the future of Ukraine and its relations with both the United States and Russia.

The international community remains watchful as these developments unfold, understanding that the stakes in this conflict continue to rise, affecting not only Ukraine but the broader geopolitical landscape.