Rupali Ganguly Critiques Supreme Court’s Stray Dog Relocation Ruling

The recent ruling by the Supreme Court of India directing the relocation of all stray dogs in the Delhi-NCR region to shelter homes has sparked significant backlash from various quarters, including television star Rupali Ganguly. The actress, known for her role in the popular series Anupamaa, took to social media to voice her opposition to the decision, emphasizing the cultural and protective role that stray dogs play in society.

On August 12, 2025, Ganguly shared her concerns on her X account, stating, “In our traditions, dogs guard Bhairav Baba’s temple and are fed on Amavasya for blessings. They’ve grown up on our streets, guarding shops, waiting outside our doors, barking away thieves.” She further argued that removing these animals from their familiar environments would be detrimental, likening it to “silencing an alarm before a fire.”

Ganguly’s statement reflects a broader sentiment among animal lovers and activists who believe that the Supreme Court’s decision is not an act of compassion but rather a form of exile. She insisted that instead of relocating stray dogs, society should focus on caring for them through vaccination and proper feeding, allowing them to continue living in their natural habitats.

Public and Celebrity Reactions to the Ruling

The Supreme Court’s ruling has not only drawn criticism from Ganguly but has also been met with disapproval from several celebrities and members of the public. Prominent figures such as Janhvi Kapoor, Varun Dhawan, and Raveena Tandon have spoken out against the ruling, advocating for initiatives focused on sterilization and vaccination rather than confinement.

In light of the ruling, social media has seen a surge of petitions and calls for community action. Influencer Dhanashree Verma has encouraged individuals to adopt stray dogs and contribute to local shelters. She stated that providing basic facilities for these animals is crucial for their welfare.

As public protests against the Supreme Court’s decision unfold in Delhi, the debate continues over the best approach to managing the stray dog population in urban areas. Activists argue that comprehensive strategies, including community education and responsible pet ownership, could lead to more sustainable solutions without resorting to relocation.

The Supreme Court’s directive has highlighted the complex relationship between humans and animals within urban environments, raising questions about cultural practices, community safety, and animal rights. As the discussion evolves, it remains to be seen how local authorities will respond to the growing dissent and whether alternative measures will be considered in place of the current ruling.