Connect with us

Health

High Court Rules Married Daughters Eligible for Compassionate Appointments

Editorial

Published

on

A division bench of the Allahabad High Court has determined that married daughters are eligible for compassionate appointments, overturning a prior ruling that denied such claims based on marital status. The bench, consisting of Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta and Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, directed the district basic education officer in Deoria to reassess the claim of Chanda Devi within eight weeks, considering all relevant details.

Chanda Devi’s initial claim for a compassionate appointment following the death of her father, Sampurnanand Pandey, was rejected by the district basic education officer on December 27, 2016. The officer argued that her marriage disqualified her from receiving benefits under the government order dated September 4, 2000, as amended on July 2, 2004.

In a previous ruling, the single judge acknowledged that excluding married daughters from these benefits was inconsistent with the precedent set in the case of Smt. Vimla Srivastava Vs. State of UP in 2015. Despite this, the single judge ultimately dismissed the writ petition, citing a lack of evidence to prove that Chanda Devi was dependent on her deceased father due to her husband’s employment status. The judge also noted that nearly 11 years had passed since her father’s death, suggesting that her claim was too delayed to be considered.

During the special appeal, Chanda Devi’s legal representative contended that the district basic education officer had not initially rejected the claim on the grounds of her marital status. Therefore, they argued, the single judge’s focus on this issue was unwarranted. The division bench’s recent ruling underscores the importance of evaluating claims based on their merits rather than on marital status.

This decision marks a significant development in the interpretation of compassionate appointment policies, potentially impacting many in similar situations. The court’s clarification that marital status should not preclude eligibility for compassionate appointments reflects a broader understanding of familial support dynamics.

The Allahabad High Court’s ruling on August 12, 2025, reinforces the notion that the circumstances surrounding a claim should be scrutinized rather than dismissed outright due to personal status. As the case returns to the district basic education officer, it highlights the ongoing discussions regarding the rights of married daughters in employment matters across India.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.