Connect with us

World

Comet 3I/ATLAS Survives Solar Encounter, Fuels Alien Theories

Editorial

Published

on

Astronomers are abuzz over the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS, which has surpassed expectations following its close encounter with the Sun. Initially discovered in July 2025, many anticipated that this celestial body would disintegrate during its orbit. Instead, 3I/ATLAS emerged intact, boasting a striking blue-green glow and a tail extending over a million kilometers. The comet’s resilience has reignited discussions about its nature, with some scientists proposing that it may not be a natural object at all.

Avi Loeb Raises Controversial Questions

On November 11, 2025, researchers using the Nordic Optical Telescope in the Canary Islands captured new images of 3I/ATLAS, revealing that it did not fragment during its perilous orbit around the Sun. Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb highlighted this observation, stating that the comet remains “an active, single body, with no evidence of breakup.” This finding has prompted Loeb to assert that the powerful jets observed around the comet could indicate an artificial origin.

Loeb’s calculations suggest that the energy delivered to 3I/ATLAS at perihelion was approximately 700 Joules per square meter per second. He argues that to produce the observed jets, the comet would need an absorbing area exceeding 1,600 square kilometers, which he considers implausible for an object of its size. He emphasized that such findings could point toward a radical idea: that 3I/ATLAS may not be behaving like a typical comet because it is not one.

Debate Over the Nature of 3I/ATLAS

Loeb’s most provocative theory posits that the jets around 3I/ATLAS might act as “technological thrusters.” This hypothesis suggests that the comet could be using a propulsion system to accelerate away from the Sun, akin to maneuvers performed by advanced spacecraft. He posits that this could explain both the comet’s survival during its solar encounter and its unusual structural features, including an “anti-tail” that points toward the Sun.

Despite Loeb’s assertions, the broader scientific community is divided. Darryl Seligman, an astronomy professor at Michigan State University, has dismissed the notion of extraterrestrial technology. Seligman maintains that the comet’s survival aligns with its estimated nucleus size of around 1 kilometer in diameter, which is large for a comet. He argues that Loeb’s interpretations of mass-loss rates and jet formation may exaggerate the evidence.

Adding further support to the natural comet theory, the MeerKAT radio telescope in South Africa detected signs of hydroxyl radicals on October 24, 2025. These molecules typically form when sunlight breaks apart water, a classic indicator of a comet shedding material as it approaches the Sun. The absence of such signals in September suggests that 3I/ATLAS is indeed a water-rich comet.

The ongoing debate emphasizes the complexities surrounding 3I/ATLAS. As scientists grapple with the implications of this interstellar visitor, they are challenged to reconsider their assumptions about celestial objects from beyond our solar system. Whether viewed as a resilient comet or a sophisticated artifact, 3I/ATLAS has already established itself as a captivating subject of inquiry for astronomers and enthusiasts alike.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.