Connect with us

Sports

Zak Crawley Struggles with Pair of Ducks in Ashes Test

Editorial

Published

on

Zak Crawley faced significant challenges during the first Ashes Test at Perth’s Optus Stadium on March 16, 2024, as he became the fourth English opener to record a pair of ducks. His second dismissal came in the first over of England’s second innings, falling to Australian pacer Mitchell Starc, who made a remarkable one-handed catch. This unfortunate performance places Crawley alongside notable names such as Trevor Bailey, Dennis Amiss, and Michael Atherton, who also recorded pairs in past Ashes matches.

Crawley had previously been dismissed in the first innings after nicking a delivery to slips, where Usman Khawaja made the catch. His back-to-back failures mark a rare occurrence in the Ashes, with Crawley now being part of a record where three consecutive innings saw wickets fall before any runs were scored. The situation highlights the intense pressure faced by openers in such pivotal matches.

In seven Tests this year, Crawley has accumulated 414 runs across 12 innings, averaging 34.50 with a strike rate exceeding 63. His performance included a century, three fifties, and a top score of 124. Despite his recent struggles, Crawley has demonstrated his potential in previous matches.

Australia’s first innings concluded at 132 runs, trailing England’s first total of 172. A significant partnership between Ollie Pope and Ben Duckett helped England build a lead of 99 runs by the end of the first session on day two. At that point, England was sitting comfortably at 59/1, with Duckett on 28* and Pope on 24*.

Crawley’s dismissal set a challenging tone as England aimed to extend their lead. Earlier, Australia resumed day two at 123/9, with Brendan Doggett and Nathan Lyon at the crease. England’s bowling attack, led by captain Ben Stokes with figures of 5/23, managed to restrict Australia effectively, claiming crucial wickets early on.

Stokes’s efforts were complemented by Brydon Carse and Jofra Archer, who added pressure, leading to the quick dismissals of key players like Marnus Labuschagne and Steve Smith. The Australian innings ended shortly after Stokes’s breakthrough, giving England a solid platform.

As England looked to consolidate their position, Duckett and Pope’s partnership proved vital. Duckett displayed aggression against both Starc and Scott Boland, while Pope’s clever strike rotation ensured steady scoring. Their partnership reached a half-century in just over ten overs, showcasing their intent to build a robust lead.

On day one, England had opted to bat first after winning the toss. Despite promising starts, they quickly found themselves in trouble at 39/3 before a stabilizing partnership between Pope and Harry Brook. Although Brook managed to score 52, England’s batting lineup faltered under pressure from Starc, who finished with remarkable figures of 7/58.

In summary, the first Ashes Test at Perth has seen England grapple with early setbacks, particularly highlighted by Crawley’s pair of ducks. As the match progresses, both teams will look to capitalize on their strengths and turn the tide in this fiercely contested series.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.