Texas Senate Candidate Defends Controversial Remarks on Hanuman Statue

Texas Republican Senate candidate Alexander Duncan has sparked significant controversy by defending his remarks regarding the recently unveiled Hanuman statue in Sugar Land, Texas. In a video released on social media, Duncan referred to the statue as a “false statue of a false Hindu God,” prompting backlash from various communities, including the Hindu American Foundation.

In his latest statement, Duncan reiterated his stance, asserting that his comments were not intended to be anti-Hindu but rather a reflection of his Christian values. “We should be asking these questions,” he stated, emphasizing a warning against the worship of “man-made idols.” This declaration has reignited discussions about religious tolerance and the political implications of such remarks.

Background of the Controversy

The Hanuman statue, which stands at an impressive 90 feet, was unveiled in 2024 and is recognized as the tallest of its kind in North America. Its installation is part of a broader cultural initiative, celebrating the rich diversity of faiths and traditions in the region. However, Duncan’s comments have been met with criticism, particularly from the Hindu American Foundation, which accuses him of promoting religious intolerance.

The incident occurs in the context of growing tensions surrounding the H-1B visa fee discourse, which has already fueled anti-India rhetoric online. Critics argue that Duncan’s comments could exacerbate divisive sentiments within the community.

Reactions from the Community

Reactions to Duncan’s remarks have been swift and varied. Many community leaders and activists have voiced their concerns, highlighting the potential for increased tension between different cultural groups. The Hindu American Foundation released a statement condemning Duncan’s comments, emphasizing the importance of mutual respect and understanding among diverse faiths.

As political campaigns intensify leading up to the elections, Duncan’s remarks and the subsequent reactions reflect broader societal debates about identity, faith, and the role of political figures in shaping public discourse. The controversy surrounding the Hanuman statue underscores the need for constructive dialogue in an increasingly polarized environment.

Overall, the situation exemplifies the challenges candidates face when addressing sensitive cultural topics. As Duncan continues his campaign, the implications of his statements may resonate beyond the immediate political landscape, influencing public perception and community relations in Texas and beyond.