Connect with us

Politics

Owaisi Critiques Gaza Peace Plan, Questions India’s Leadership

Editorial

Published

on

Asaduddin Owaisi, the chief of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM), has expressed strong concerns regarding the Gaza peace plan. In a recent interview with ANI, he criticized the plan for lacking clarity about the future of a Palestinian state and likened the negotiations to a “real estate project.” Owaisi emphasized the need for transparency, particularly regarding accountability for civilian casualties in the ongoing conflict.

He highlighted alarming statistics, stating that approximately 65,000 Palestinians have been killed, including 20,000 children and 15,000 women. Owaisi accused Israel of committing genocide and questioned the effectiveness of international involvement in the peace process, specifically referencing Tony Blair and former U.S. President Donald Trump. He asked, “What will they do in the board that will be formed? Where is the Palestinian Authority?”

Owaisi further challenged the Indian government’s stance, particularly the praise directed towards Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court against him. “How can the Prime Minister of India praise the leadership of Netanyahu, who leads a completely genocidal regime?” Owaisi questioned, calling attention to the BJP’s narrative that Israel supports India. He argued, “We pay them; no one does it for free.”

Political Context and Responses

The AIMIM leader’s remarks come in the wake of India’s diplomatic missions to various countries, aimed at reinforcing its zero-tolerance policy toward terrorism following the recent Pahalgam terror attack. Owaisi clarified that his party’s actions were not politically motivated but were intended to represent India’s interests. He stated, “We did not go for the Prime Minister but for the country.”

Owaisi also responded to former Home Minister P. Chidambaram‘s comments regarding India’s response to the 26/11 terror attacks. He noted that the government’s strategy has evolved over time, saying, “The government’s strategy at that time was different; today’s strategy is different.” He expressed support for Operation Sindoor, emphasizing the need for vigilance against potential terrorist acts from Pakistan.

He remarked, “We need to remain alert on this issue. If we expect that after conducting Operation Sindoor, these people will not commit any misdeeds, then we are making a mistake.” This statement underscores his belief in the persistent threat posed by Pakistan’s military and intelligence agencies.

Engagement with the Government

Owaisi clarified his relationship with the ruling BJP, stating, “I have no connection with the BJP.” He referenced a recent instance where he was invited to an all-party meeting concerning national security, highlighting the necessity of engaging with government officials for the sake of progress on critical issues. “I’m politically opposed to you, but I want to get work done, and you’re in the government,” he explained.

The AIMIM chief’s statements not only reflect his concerns about the Gaza peace process but also his broader apprehensions about India’s political dynamics and security strategies. His critique of both international and domestic leaders serves as a call for greater accountability and clarity in addressing humanitarian crises and national security.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.