Netanyahu’s Gaza Plan Faces Internal Backlash Amid Conflict

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is advancing a contentious initiative to construct a “humanitarian city” in Rafah, located in southern Gaza, even as Israeli military operations intensify in the region. This proposal, intended to temporarily relocate Palestinian civilians, has ignited criticism not only from opposition parties but also from within Netanyahu’s own government and military ranks.

During a closed-door session of the Israeli Security Cabinet on Sunday evening, Netanyahu dismissed plans put forth by the Defence Ministry and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). The military had estimated that the construction would require at least one year and cost approximately ₪15 billion (about USD 4 billion). In contrast, Netanyahu claims the project can be completed in just six months, accusing military officials of intentionally prolonging the timeline and inflating costs to obstruct the initiative.

Disagreements Within Government Ranks

The clash has resulted in notable tensions among senior leaders and defense officials. Cabinet members have rejected the IDF’s detailed plan and revised timeline, leading to heated discussions over the project’s feasibility. Despite the pushback, Netanyahu remains adamant that the humanitarian city is crucial and has requested that planners present a more cost-effective and expedited model by Monday.

Even if a temporary ceasefire is achieved in Gaza, Netanyahu has indicated that Israeli military actions may resume. He emphasizes the necessity of the Rafah project to address humanitarian needs amidst ongoing conflict.

Concerns from Opposition and Public Reaction

Opposition leaders have voiced strong objections to the plan, with many viewing it as a political maneuver aimed at bolstering Netanyahu’s popularity. A report by Middle East Monitor highlights that critics believe the estimated ₪15 billion should be directed towards essential services such as education, fuel subsidies, or public transportation in Israel.

Key opposition figure Yair Lapid criticized the initiative on X (formerly Twitter), arguing that the funds could better serve the construction of classrooms for Israeli children or enhance childcare facilities. He accused Netanyahu of utilizing taxpayer money to appease far-right ministers in an effort to maintain his coalition government.

The proposed humanitarian city aims to provide temporary housing for Palestinians, with Defence Minister Yoav Gallant suggesting it could ultimately facilitate their migration to other countries. Israeli officials predict that the project may cost between USD 2.7 billion and USD 4 billion. If the plan is approved, Israel would initially bear most of the financial burden.

Critics assert that rather than investing billions in this controversial project, the government should prioritize ending the conflict and securing the release of hostages. The plan continues to evoke significant debate, reflecting deep divisions regarding its purpose, viability, and ethical implications.