Connect with us

Business

Experts Urge Honest Conversations About Death at Festival in Bengaluru

Editorial

Published

on

The inaugural “Good.To.Go Death Literacy Festival” held in Bengaluru focused on the importance of open discussions about death among families. Organized by Pallium India and the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, the event featured experts emphasizing the need for honesty, legal tools, and effective palliative care in preparing for end-of-life scenarios.

During the session titled “What does dying in India look like — and what needs to change?”, medical professionals highlighted the common trajectories of dying and advocated for clear communication about end-of-life planning. Dr. Roop Gursahani, a neurologist at PD Hinduja Hospital in Mumbai, shared insights about the three primary paths of dying: the rapid decline associated with cancer, the cyclical nature of organ failure, and the slow progression of dementia. “Only 7% of people over 50 die suddenly,” he noted. “The majority will experience a prolonged decline, and families need to prepare for that reality.”

The festival also showcased the personal experiences of caregivers. Actor and caregiver Darius Sunawala recounted his journey, underscoring the emotional weight of silence surrounding death. “If you think the conversation is difficult now, it will be impossible later,” he remarked, contrasting his father’s openness about death with the silence of his father-in-law, which he described as a source of pain.

On the legal front, Hardik Dua, a senior resident fellow at the Vidhi Centre, discussed the significance of Advance Medical Directives (AMDs). He explained how the Supreme Court’s 2018 ruling legitimized these directives, with further simplifications made in 2023, enhancing accessibility for end-of-life choices. “Any sheet of paper will do—write down your care goals, talk to your family, appoint a representative,” Dua advised. He emphasized that while the law provides a framework, action and awareness are essential for true progress.

The conversation also highlighted the systemic changes needed in palliative care. Sweety Thomas, representing the Ajit Isaac Foundation, called for end-of-life care to be recognized as a public health right rather than an act of charity. “This is about systemic change and building research-backed multidisciplinary centers,” she stated. The response to the festival on social media, according to Thomas, indicated a growing readiness for these conversations among a diverse audience.

Finally, Dr. Rajani Bhat, a pulmonologist and palliative care physician at Sparsh Hospital in Bengaluru, spoke to the necessity of extending care beyond hospital walls. She recalled a poignant moment when a renowned rural doctor with advanced heart failure expressed concern about not receiving care at home. “That’s what palliative care does—it brings care home when hospitals can’t heal,” Bhat explained.

The discussions at the festival reflect a significant cultural shift towards acknowledging and addressing the realities of death and dying in India. As experts and caregivers alike advocate for more open conversations, the hope is that families will be better equipped to navigate these challenging yet inevitable experiences.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.