Trump Defends Tariffs After Court Ruling on Trade Authority

US President Donald Trump has asserted that his administration’s tariffs generated “trillions of dollars” for the American economy, despite a recent ruling by the US Court of Appeals declaring that he exceeded his presidential authority in imposing them. The court’s decision, announced on September 1, 2025, highlighted the necessity for congressional approval when levying tariffs, emphasizing that this power lies “exclusively” with Congress.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump defended his trade policies, stating, “Prices are WAY DOWN in the USA, with virtually no inflation.” He criticized what he termed “ridiculous, corrupt politician-approved ‘Windmills,’” claiming they negatively impact energy prices. Trump further noted, “Gasoline is at many year lows. All of this despite magnificent Tariffs, which are bringing in trillions of dollars from Countries that took total advantage of us for decades, and are making America STRONG and RESPECTED AGAIN!!!”

This legal setback marks a significant challenge to Trump’s trade approach. The court found that the use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs or taxes unilaterally. The ruling specifically addressed the nature of “reciprocal tariffs” that Trump implemented during his tenure, asserting that such actions require legislative backing.

Despite the ruling, the court has stayed its decision until October 14, 2025, allowing the Trump administration time to potentially appeal to the US Supreme Court. Trump has indicated his intent to pursue this route, arguing that the ruling undermines the presidential powers essential for safeguarding national economic interests.

While the court’s decision affects Trump’s unilateral tariff actions, it is important to note that tariffs on steel and aluminium, enacted under a different legal framework, will remain in place. This ruling could have implications for future trade policies and the balance of power between the executive branch and Congress regarding economic regulation.

As this situation develops, the impact on American businesses and consumers will be closely monitored, especially concerning prices and trade relations with other nations. Trump’s claims of economic success through tariffs will likely be scrutinized in light of this legal ruling.