Connect with us

Science

Major Genetic Study Reveals First Humans Reached Australia 60,000 Years Ago

Editorial

Published

on

A recent genetic study has clarified the timing and routes of the first human migration to Australia, confirming that modern humans reached the continent approximately 60,000 years ago. This significant finding aligns with archaeological evidence and traditional Aboriginal oral histories, indicating a long-standing human presence in Australia much earlier than previously estimated by some genetic models.

The research, published in the journal Science Advances, involved an analysis of nearly 2,500 ancient and modern genomes from populations across Australia, New Guinea, and the broader Pacific region. This extensive genetic data not only pinpoints the arrival time but also reveals how these early humans traveled to Australia, uncovering two distinct migration routes into the ancient supercontinent known as Sahul.

Two Distinct Migration Routes Identified

The study identifies that the earliest ancestors of both Aboriginal Australians and New Guineans entered Sahul via two separate pathways. One group migrated south through the Indonesian islands towards northern Australia, while another group traversed a northern corridor, likely passing through the Philippines before arriving in New Guinea. These findings support existing oceanographic and archaeological models suggesting multiple viable entry points into Sahul.

Both groups were part of a larger population that migrated out of Africa between 70,000 and 80,000 years ago. Researchers indicate that the ancestors of Australians and New Guineans diverged in South or Southeast Asia thousands of years prior to their eastward progression.

Migration Dependent on Maritime Skills

The findings reinforce the notion that early humans reached Sahul using watercraft, as the region was never fully connected to mainland Asia. Even during the lowest sea levels of the Pleistocene, significant ocean crossings were necessary. The researchers also suggest that migration into Near Oceania, which includes the Bismarck Archipelago and Solomon Islands, occurred around the same time, indicating a pattern of ongoing movement and interaction rather than isolated settlement.

For decades, scholars have debated whether Australia was settled between 47,000 and 51,000 years ago or as early as 65,000 years ago. The new genetic timeline strongly supports the earlier date, providing one of the most precise reconstructions of human arrival and migration across Sahul. This also refines the overall timeline for humanity’s dispersal from Africa, pointing to a major migration event occurring between 50,000 and 70,000 years ago.

Acknowledging Indigenous Histories

The results of this genetic study affirm what many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities have long asserted: their connection to the land spans back at least 60,000 years. Researchers emphasize that these findings not only bolster the scientific timeline but also underscore the considerable seafaring knowledge required for these early journeys.

Together with archaeological and climatic evidence, this comprehensive genetic analysis provides the clearest understanding yet of one of humanity’s most significant migrations—the moment our species first reached the expansive lands of ancient Australia.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.